Category Guide

ADA Compliant Content & Curriculum Tools for K-12 Districts

Content and curriculum platforms deliver the actual instructional material students engage with — reading passages, videos, interactive lessons. For students with visual impairments, learning disabilities, or physical disabilities, the accessibility of these tools directly determines whether they can access the curriculum. A student who can't navigate a reading platform with a screen reader, or who can't read low-contrast text, is excluded from the content — not just inconvenienced.

Tool Risk Tier VPAT Status WCAG Claim Note
Khan Academy Low Exists (2024) Specific claim Strongest documentation in this category
Newsela Medium Exists (2023) Specific claim VPAT exists; verify for current version
BrainPOP Medium Exists (2022) Specific claim Older VPAT — request updated version
Discovery Education Medium Exists, current Partial claim Partial support areas; review for video accessibility
CommonLit High Not found None No documentation; widely used for ELA
ReadWorks High Not found None No documentation; widely used for reading

Khan Academy stands out in this category with a 2024 VPAT and specific WCAG 2.1 AA claim — the strongest documentation of any content platform reviewed. Districts with flexibility in curriculum tool selection can treat Khan Academy's documentation strength as a differentiator.

Khan Academy

Low Risk

2024 VPAT, specific WCAG 2.1 AA claim. Best-documented content platform in this review.

View Full Review →

Newsela

Medium Risk

2023 VPAT with specific WCAG claim. Solid documentation but verify current version is covered.

View Full Review →

BrainPOP

Medium Risk

2022 VPAT with specific WCAG claim. Documentation exists but is approaching age threshold — request updated ACR.

View Full Review →

Discovery Education

Medium Risk

Current VPAT with partial conformance claim. Strong presence in districts but video accessibility areas need review.

View Full Review →

CommonLit

High Risk

No VPAT found, no WCAG claim. Widely deployed for ELA. Districts using CommonLit for required reading assignments should request VPAT now.

View Full Review →

ReadWorks

High Risk

No VPAT found, no WCAG claim. Free platform widely adopted for reading passages. Request VPAT and review for screen reader compatibility.

View Full Review →

Specific Accessibility Risks in Content Tools

  1. Reading passage accessibility: Text must be real HTML (not images of text), resizable, and compatible with read-aloud software. Students with dyslexia or visual impairments depend on this.
  2. Video accessibility: Educational videos require accurate synchronized captions, not just auto-generated. Audio description tracks are needed when visuals convey curriculum-critical information.
  3. Interactive content: Quizzes and exercises embedded in content platforms must be keyboard navigable and provide error identification that works with screen readers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Khan Academy is rated Low risk by DistrictCheck with a current 2024 VPAT and specific WCAG 2.1 AA claim — the strongest documentation in this category. BrainPOP, Newsela, and Discovery Education have VPATs with varying degrees of completeness; CommonLit and ReadWorks have no current VPAT documentation.
CommonLit is rated High risk by DistrictCheck — no VPAT is publicly available and no specific WCAG conformance claim has been made. Districts using CommonLit for required ELA assignments should request accessibility documentation from the vendor and document accessible alternatives for students who cannot use the platform without barriers.
Yes. Under WCAG 2.1 criterion 1.2.5, prerecorded video where the audio doesn't fully describe the visual content requires an audio description track. This applies to instructional videos on Discovery Education, BrainPOP, and any other content platform that uses video as a primary instructional medium.

Check All Your Content Tools

Go to DistrictCheck →