Request current VPAT
Ask your vendor for a VPAT addressing WCAG 2.1 AA specifically. Accept no older than 18 months.
Why LMS accessibility matters most — the LMS is the platform students spend the most time in. Every assignment, every grade, every digital interaction runs through it. An inaccessible LMS doesn't just block one activity — it blocks the entire learning environment.
| Tool | Risk Tier | VPAT Status | WCAG 2.1 Claim | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canvas | Low | Exists (2024) | Specific claim | Districts wanting strongest documentation |
| Google Classroom | Low | Exists, current | Specific claim | Google Workspace districts |
| Microsoft Teams for Education | Low | Exists (2024) | Specific claim | Microsoft 365 districts |
| Schoology | High | Unclear post-acquisition | Vague claim | Needs updated VPAT from PowerSchool |
Canvas publishes current VPAT documentation with specific WCAG 2.1 AA claims. It is one of the stronger LMS options for ADA compliance in K-12 deployments.
Google publishes accessibility conformance materials for Workspace products with specific WCAG claims. Particularly strong for districts already in the Google ecosystem.
Microsoft publishes current VPAT documentation with specific WCAG 2.1 AA claims for Teams. A solid option for Microsoft 365 districts with accessible documentation.
Schoology's VPAT status is unclear following PowerSchool's acquisition. Districts using Schoology should request updated accessibility documentation immediately.
Use this sequence to conduct a reasonable, documented accessibility review of your LMS before renewal.
Ask your vendor for a VPAT addressing WCAG 2.1 AA specifically. Accept no older than 18 months.
Verify the VPAT covers the LMS platform itself — LTI tools need separate verification and cannot rely on the LMS documentation.
Look for "Partially Supports" and "Does Not Support" entries in student-facing criteria. Flag any that affect your use case.
Build VPAT renewal into your annual contract review process. LMS platforms update frequently and documentation can become stale.
Canvas, Google Classroom, and Microsoft Teams for Education all have current VPATs with specific WCAG 2.1 AA claims and are rated Low risk by DistrictCheck. Schoology is rated High risk due to unclear VPAT status post-acquisition.
No. An LMS VPAT covers the LMS platform only. Third-party tools embedded via LTI integrations require separate accessibility documentation.
At minimum annually and at every contract renewal. LMS products are updated frequently and a VPAT from two years ago may not reflect current conformance status.
Need a full accessibility audit of your district edtech stack? DistrictCheck reviews all the tools in your LMS ecosystem and prioritizes compliance risk.