Kami ADA Compliance

Kami is commonly used for document annotation, worksheet completion, PDF markup, and classroom collaboration. In many districts it becomes the layer students use to interact with otherwise static handouts. That means accessibility questions extend beyond the app shell itself to the experience of reading, navigating, and marking up classroom documents inside the tool.

DistrictCheck rates Kami as medium risk because it is clearly important in classroom workflows, but a current public VPAT is not easy to verify. Annotation platforms deserve close review for keyboard support, focus order, labeling of markup tools, and whether drawing, highlighting, and comment functions have accessible alternatives. A district can easily assume a PDF workflow is covered when in reality the markup interaction introduces a new barrier.

The right district action is to request a current VPAT, ask specifically about annotation and classroom assignment flows, and note whether accessible alternatives exist when teachers depend on freehand or visual markup. Medium risk here reflects a tool that may be workable in many cases but still lacks the documentation standard districts need for a clean compliance file.